WEKO3
アイテム
回心と悲劇 W・ジェイムズとB・ロナーガンの回心論とその問題点
https://doi.org/10.18901/00000315
https://doi.org/10.18901/00000315b627d6bc-a183-40df-aca2-5bfb6095493d
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
055-068-中畑最終 (389.9 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2013-03-06 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 回心と悲劇 W・ジェイムズとB・ロナーガンの回心論とその問題点 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Conversion and Tragedy ─ The Theories of Conversion of W. James and B. Lonergan and their Problems ─ | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | W・ジェイムズ | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | B・ロナーガン | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | S・ヴェーユ | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 回心 | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | 悲劇 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18901/00000315 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者名 |
中畑, 邦夫
× 中畑, 邦夫 |
|||||
| 著者名（英） |
Nakahata, Kunio
× Nakahata, Kunio |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The purpose of this article is to outline the main studies on conversion, which plays an extremely essential role in Christianity. Here, I outline two theories about conversion. One is the study of the psychology of religion by William James, and the other is found in the Catholic theology of Bernard Lonergan. By outlining these two studies, we can find the distinctive characteristics of each theory, which are clearly opposed to each other.That is, James’ theory values personal factors in conversion, while Lonergan’s theory values institutional or communal factors in terms of political theory. So, these two theories diverge as liberalist and communitarian in terms of political theory. I support neither of these two theories. Instead, I suggest a third way which goes beyond then. It is an attempt to construe the process of conversion as one of tragedy in the sense of the thought of Nietzsche. At the end of this article, I give some brief comments on the thought of Simone Weil, who I think expressed her theory of conversion and her own experience of conversion itself as tragedy. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
麗澤学際ジャーナル en : Reitaku Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 巻 21, 号 1, p. 55-68, 発行日 2013-03-10 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 麗澤大学経済学会 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0919-6714 | |||||
