WEKO3
アイテム
Plagiarism, Hiroshima, and Intertextuality:Ibuse Masuji's Black Rain Reconsidered
https://doi.org/10.18901/00000169
https://doi.org/10.18901/00000169a4fac914-c367-44a9-bee2-cb37298f9be4
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
023-056_Lin (396.5 kB)
|
.png)
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2012-05-07 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Plagiarism, Hiroshima, and Intertextuality:Ibuse Masuji's Black Rain Reconsidered | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Ibuse Masuji | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Black Rain | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | plagiarism | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | Hiroshima | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | intertextuality | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | modern Japanese literature | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.18901/00000169 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者名 |
Lin, Yi-ling
× Lin, Yi-ling |
|||||
| 著者名（英） |
Lin, Yi-ling
× Lin, Yi-ling |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | This paper examines the ongoing controversy about whether or not Ibuse Masuji plagiarize(tōsaku/hyōsetsu/tōyō) from the diary of Shigematsu Shizuma, the most important source that Ibuse used in writing his highly acclaimed a-bomb novel Kuroi ame (Black rain, 1966). By analyzing the contexts of Ibuse’s composition, the strategies and motives of Toyota Seishi(who initially stirred up the plagiarism controversy), and the textual difference between Ibuse’s novel and Shigematsu’s diary, this paper demonstrates that the accusation of Black Rain as a work of plagiarism is a decontextualized and misleading oversimplification that neglects the complex process of literary creation. The intertextual inquiry not only shows that Ibuse’s augmentation of the diary has transformed his most important source and created new meanings but also calls for a rethinking of the place of intertextuality in relation to the creative process in the extraordinary number of plagiarism cases in twentieth-century Japanese literature. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
麗澤学際ジャーナル en : Reitaku Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 巻 19, 号 2, p. 23-55, 発行日 2011-09-30 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 麗澤大学経済学会 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0919-6714 | |||||
